In the pursuit of athletic excellence, two male collegiate athletes, specifically a long-distance runner and a baseball throwing athlete, have devised a collaborative training regimen for the off-season outside of their competitive seasons. Their objective is to collectively improve their athletic abilities by engaging in joint resistance and power training sessions. This paper argues that although the camaraderie and friendly competition cultivated through collective training are advantageous, a one-size-fits-all training approach is counterproductive due to the distinct physiological and biomechanical requirements of distance running and baseball-throwing athletes. Such an approach may impede the advancement of sport-specific objectives. This paper aims to explore the scientific rationale behind individualized training protocols, highlighting the significance of sports-specific training for optimal performance, as emphasized by Hoffman (2014). It will investigate the potential adverse effects of implementing a uniform training plan on the performance of each athlete.
Why Individualized Sports Performance Training?
Although the utilization of a one-size-fits-all training program may appear pragmatic and potentially cost-effective, the physiological foundations of distinct sports advocate for a more individualized and tailored methodology. The biomechanical and physiological demands of distance runners and baseball-throwing athletes are unique and cannot be adequately addressed with a generalized training program. Consider, for example, the energy systems predominantly employed in these sports. The primary source of energy in distance running is predominantly derived from aerobic metabolism, which primarily activates slow-twitch muscle fibers that are specifically adapted for endurance and stamina (Alvero-Cruz et al., 2020). On the other hand, it is worth noting that baseball-throwing athletes are characterized by an anaerobic nature, necessitating rapid and forceful movements that engage fast-twitch muscle fibers, which are specifically adapted for generating strength and power (Abdelkader et al., 2016).
The biomechanical requirements of these athletes exhibit a comparable level of diversity. The practice of distance running requires dedicated attention to running economy, stride length, and appropriate foot placement while prioritizing efficiency and the ability to maintain a consistent pace. On the other hand, the achievement of the baseball-throwing athlete is contingent upon factors such as linear and rotational power, angular velocity, and the proficient coordination of muscle groups during the throwing motion. Training programs that do not adequately address these factors might result in not just suboptimal performance but also heightened vulnerability to injuries. Evidence suggests that athletic performance may be negatively affected, and injuries may increase when athletes participate in general training programs that do not cater to the specific demands of their respective sports (Suchomel, Nimphius, & Stone, 2016).
The demand for customized training programs that cater to individual sports is not merely a passing fad, but rather an imperative rooted in scientific principles. The utilization of a uniform approach for athletes with essentially distinct physiological requirements can be likened to the act of forcing a square peg into a round hole. This practice not only hampers their ability to achieve optimal performance but also heightens the likelihood of physical harm. Therefore, it is essential to reevaluate and adjust training strategies to effectively correspond with the specific requirements and expectations of each athletic discipline. This will ultimately enhance performance to its fullest potential and minimize the risk of physical harm.
Individualized Sports Performance Training for the Distance Runner
When considering the unique requirements of a long-distance runner, it becomes apparent that a customized training method has the potential to significantly impact performance outcomes. Resistance training and plyometric training are highly advantageous training approaches for endurance athletes. Although it may seem paradoxical to incorporate these techniques commonly associated with activities emphasizing strength and power, scholarly investigations suggest otherwise. The systematic review conducted by Alcaraz-Ibañez and Rodríguez-Pérez (2018) provided evidence that incorporating resistance training into the training regimen of distance runners can lead to enhancements in both maximal speed and running economy. This finding supports the notion that a multifaceted approach to training can result in significant advantages.
To illustrate, a sample training program for a long-distance runner may include components of resistance training, with emphasis placed on compound exercises such as squats and deadlifts to develop overall muscular strength and stability. The integration of plyometric workouts, such as box jumps and bounding, has the potential to enhance neuromuscular efficiency and power. In addition to the exercises and lifts, it would be advisable to incorporate extended aerobic sessions to improve aerobic capacity, as well as specific mobility exercises aimed at preserving joint health. The comprehensive strategy aims to tackle the requirement for enhanced running economy, a critical factor influencing performance in endurance sports, while simultaneously focusing on aerobic capacity and biomechanical efficiency.
The examination of potential adverse effects that may arise from the incorporation of a baseball throwing athlete training regimen into the routine of a long-distance runner is of utmost importance. The training program of a baseball throwing athlete would primarily focus on hypertrophy and power training activities, perhaps resulting in an undesired increase of muscle mass and the risk of excessive weight gain for a long-distance runner. The circumstances may potentially hinder the runner's aerobic efficiency and biomechanics, thereby conflicting with the principal training goals of an endurance athlete. The importance lies not only in exerting effort but also in employing strategic approaches, such as including resistance and plyometric workouts that effectively align with the unique requirements of long-distance running, rather than following a regimen intended for a fundamentally distinct athletic pursuit.
Individualized Sports Performance Training for the Baseball Throwing Athlete
Turning our attention to the baseball-throwing athlete, it becomes evident that this athlete performs within a domain where the attainment of power and strength serve as the primary determinants of achieving success. In contrast to the prolonged and continuous energy expenditure needed for long-distance running, baseball throwing athlete is characterized by an explosive nature that requires the rapid generation of force, muscular strength, and skillful coordination. According to Maestroni et al. (2020), it is argued that in sports such as baseball, the optimization of explosive power and rotational strength through the implementation of resistance training is necessary to achieve high-level performance.
Therefore, a training regimen designed for a baseball-throwing athlete would exhibit notable distinctions when compared to that of a long-distance runner. The fundamental basis of this training routine would consist of powerlifting exercises, including cleans, jerks, and snatches, with the primary objective of cultivating unrefined, high-intensity power. To enhance rotational strength, it is recommended to add exercises such as medicine ball rotational throws and cable twists. These exercises are particularly important for improving throwing abilities. In addition, it is crucial to incorporate strength training exercises that specifically focus on muscle hypertrophy, such as bench presses, squats, and deadlifts, to effectively develop the required muscle mass for optimal power production. Incorporating plyometric activities, such as box jumps, into a training regimen can enhance the rate of force development, to aid the transition from strength to power.
However, if a baseball-throwing athlete were to undertake a training program designed for a distance runner, they would probably have significant disadvantages. The prevalence of aerobic workouts in a training routine may result in a decrease in muscle mass and a weakened capacity to create rapid force production, which is both unfavorable factors for power athletes such as baseball-throwing athletes. Furthermore, there is a potential risk of experiencing a loss of essential fast-twitch muscle fibers, which could have a detrimental impact on the athlete's ability to generate explosive power. Cardiovascular health is of paramount importance for athletes across all disciplines. However, the training approach of baseball-throwing athletes, who excel in brief, high-intensity bursts, does not align with the conventional focus on prolonged, low-intensity exercises.
The acknowledgment of the distinct physiological demands and performance objectives associated with individual sports highlights the inadequacy and potential harm of employing a standardized training regimen. Customizing a training regimen to cater to the specific requirements of long-distance running and baseball-throwing athletes is not only advisable but imperative for athletes who are committed to attaining optimal performance in their sports.
In summary, this essay has shed light on the inherent dangers associated with employing a uniform methodology for sports training, with a particular focus on the experiences of a long-distance runner and a baseball-throwing athlete. Although the idea of fostering a sense of camaraderie is commendable when it comes to collaborative training, it is important to recognize that the varied physiological, biomechanical, and energy system demands of different sports can hinder the effectiveness of this strategy. Backed by a substantial body of research, the use of generic training methods can result in not only poor performance but also an increased susceptibility to injury.
For more exclusive content with remote coaching and individualized training checkout TopVelocity Patreon!
Checkout the TopVelocity training programs here!
References
Abdelkader, B., Abdelatif, H., Mohamed, Z., & Ali, B. (2016). THE EVALUATION OF THE AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC CAPACITIES AS A SETTER FOR DIGITAL ACHIEVEMENT AND AS AN INDEX FOR SELECTING AND GUIDING THE BEGINNER'S ATHLETICS. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science.
Alcaraz-Ibañez, M., & Rodríguez-Pérez, M. (2018). Effects of resistance training on performance in previously trained endurance runners: A systematic review. Journal of sports sciences, 36(6), 613-629.
Alvero-Cruz, J. R., Carnero, E. A., García, M. A. G., Alacid, F., Correas-Gómez, L., Rosemann, T., ... & Knechtle, B. (2020). Predictive performance models in long-distance runners: A narrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8289.
Bodemer, O. (2023). Enhancing Individual Sports Training through Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review.
Hoffman, J. (2014). Physiological aspects of sport training and performance. Human Kinetics.
Maestroni, L., Read, P., Bishop, C., & Turner, A. (2020). Strength and power training in rehabilitation: underpinning principles and practical strategies to return athletes to high performance. Sports Medicine, 50(2), 239-252.
Naclerio, F., Moody, J., & Chapman, M. (2013). Applied periodization: a methodological approach. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 8(2), 350-366.
Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., & Stone, M. H. (2016). The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports medicine, 46, 1419-1449.